Which countries deserve your money?
Tourism has the power to bring jobs and economic
development to popular destinations, but how should travelers decide where to
spend their money? Are some countries more deserving of visitors’ dollars than
others?
That’s the idea behind the 10-destination list put
together by San Francisco-based non-profit Ethical Traveler, which, since 2006,
has published an annual guide to the World’s Best Ethical Destinations in the
developing world.
Instead of
punishing countries for doing bad things, said Jeff
Greenwald, executive director of Ethical Traveler, we’re trying to offer a carrot, rewarding countries in the developing
world that are really trying to do the right thing.
And travelers, who Greenwald describes as a vast and pretty much un-united political
action group, can also reward ethical countries – or at least those
improving and moving in the right direction – by spending their time and money
there.
So which countries are the most ethical? For 2013, the
winners are Barbados, Cape Verde, Costa Rica, Ghana, Latvia, Lithuania,
Mauritius, Palau, Samoa and Uruguay. Those 10 countries scored highest in three
main areas:
·
social welfare (measured by indicators such as child
mortality rates, economic freedom and crime rates)
·
environmental protection (measured by an academic index
and share of protected areas)
·
human rights (which includes press and political freedoms,
as well as gay rights)
Greenwald explained that countries must have a good
tourism infrastructure to make the list, but the non-profit also uses the list
to promote some under-visited places that can be a role model for other
countries in their region. For example, Latvia earned high marks for improving
its environmental efforts and strong human rights record, and the country’s
parks and nature reserves make for a great off-the-beaten-path ecotourism trip.
Gauja National Park, with hiking, biking and canoeing, and the
architecture-rich capital, Riga, are a few of the Baltic country’s highlights.
In addition to just visiting these countries, travelers
should aim to spend their money in locally-owned businesses, Greenwald said, to
ensure their financial support stays in the country they’re visiting. However,
that requires a well-managed tourism infrastructure – something that countries
with poor track records in areas like child mortality and sanitation might not
have. While one could argue those places need the money even more, tourism can
put a strain on countries that face such challenges.
They need help
from other sources, and when tourism is strong and can be an asset as opposed
to a liability, then travelers can visit, Greenwald
explained.
Erica Avrami, research and education director at the
World Monuments Fund (WMF) agreed that countries need to be properly equipped
so the influx of travelers does not overwhelm local communities or heritage
sites. WMF works to preserve cultural heritage sites that run the risk of being
damaged by poorly managed tourism.
But while Avrami said that a list of ethical
destinations is a wonderful idea, the
idea of being ethical goes both ways. There’s
also a certain responsibility on the part of the traveler to make sure their
own footprint is as minimal as possible, she said.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий